The Importance Of Using Medical School Diversity Essay Samples

<h1>The Importance Of Using Medical School Diversity Essay Samples</h1><p>Medical school assorted variety paper tests can be useful devices when you are getting ready for an exposition. While it is entirely expected to discover predisposition in expositions, it is a troublesome thing to survive. In the event that you would prefer not to lose all sense of direction in the brush of predisposition in exposition composing, set yourself up well and concoct proper paper tests that feature your inclinations and the position you are composing for in the essay.</p><p></p><p>A standard clinical school assorted variety article test presents a perspective that doesn't really agree with yours. Regularly, the perspectives introduced in clinical school decent variety expositions are plainly one-sided. You will probably introduce a perspective that places you in an ideal light. Along these lines, you should be cautious about the structure you pick in your es say.</p><p></p><p>Make sure that the assorted variety test you are utilizing does exclude any off base or one-sided data. The assorted variety test you are utilizing ought exclude anything about dark men as specialists. Despite the fact that they were 'among the first'among the best' are not really exact. Because the speaker utilizes those specific words doesn't imply that the speaker underpins those announcements or is a supremacist. For instance, when a speaker utilizes the expression 'among the primary,' he may simply imply that this individual or that individual was the main individual to get a degree, however the understudy in the class may not be recorded among the top notch in their yearbook.</p><p></p><p>Another normal issue that happens while making a clinical school decent variety test is discovering enough impartial data for the essayist to put together their point of view with respect to. When you read the paper, it is past the point of no return. You have just decided on the perspective being presented.</p><p></p><p>Create a solitary passage in your clinical school decent variety test. Hold the clinical data to one sentence. Try not to broadly expound on your encounters working with a minority in a clinical setting. You should give the peruser a perspective and afterward have them associate it with their own experience.</p><p></p><p>Once you have your article prepared, don't simply toss it in the refuse since you did exclude an impartial perspective. Rather, flow your example all through the various areas of your clinical school decent variety course. Converse with the teachers to check whether there is anything they might want to remember for the educational program. Assuming this is the case, you can make a few acclimations to the substance to incorporate your very own point of view and include different thoughts that you find helpful.</p><p& gt;</p><p>Keep as a main priority that a significant issue that happens when instructing about ethnic assorted variety is that numerous understudies don't have a clue about the historical backdrop of minority bunches in their nation. They don't have the foggiest idea about the narratives of individual states. These sorts of things are significant when composing a piece about minorities. This kind of data can help the educator of your clinical school decent variety class to additionally build up a more noteworthy comprehension of how the world perspectives minorities and their situations.</p><p></p><p>Medical school assorted variety exposition tests will assist you with building up a paper that is far reaching. It will assist you with looking at your own perspectives towards minorities and see where they might be not quite the same as those of the educators. It will assist you with understanding that you are a minority. At long last, it will assist you with understanding that the particular perspective you are expounding on isn't a variation of your own bias.</p>

Essay Writing Funny - How to Write Funny

Essay Writing Funny - How to Write FunnyEssay writing funny is a lot easier than one might think. The right topic is of course the most important thing to consider. The ability to write funny comes down to a few different things, including having an original and interesting topic that will make the reader sit up and take notice.The main parts of a good essay writing funny include not just the topic itself, but also how you present your topic in the essay. There are many types of jokes in writing. The main type is a type of joke or anecdote that is used as a punch line in a story. The best part about this type of essay writing funny is that it is easy to write, the audience can understand it easily, and they can tell a lot of different things from the fact that you have told a story.When writing jokes you want to avoid using words like that in the title of your essay. If the story is set in the present, using those words could make it seem like you are telling a joke from a time perio d that is far away. Using a story for a joke can also be difficult because it requires a lot of different skills, including knowing when to use humor and when to draw the line between humor and too much.When writing jokes, you want to avoid too much seriousness and in fact you should avoid sarcasm if you want to be able to write funny. When you are trying to tell a joke, it should be easy to understand and read. It should also be funny without anyone in particular feeling offended.Writing the essay also requires that you have a few different ideas going on at once. While writing the story, you need to be able to talk about many different things. While you may be trying to tell a joke that could involve many people and give them a feeling of humor, at the same time, you need to have an idea of what will be happening in the future, too. In addition to being able to tell a story and do it in a way that is funny, you also need to have a good way of writing your essay, which you can acco mplish through your grammar. When writing essays, it is often times difficult to make sure that you get your points across, and that you make a good grammar error. Your spelling is very important. This is why it is always a good idea to hire a professional writer or professor to help you with your essay writing.Essay writing funny also requires a lot of preparation. You can't expect to be able to write funny all by yourself. The best advice that I can give when you are first beginning to write a story for a class, or to write a specific kind of essay, is to get a professional to help you. It is especially helpful if you are trying to write a joke based essay.Of course, if you have ever tried to write a joke based essay, then you know that the best advice you can give is to let the ideas flow from your head and to let your hands do the writing. When you have some free time, try to start writing and make it as funny as possible. Do this and you will soon be telling stories that have e veryone laughing.

Tips For Writing An IELTS Essay

Tips For Writing An IELTS EssayIf you are in the same boat as I am, the concept of an IELTS essay samples will come as welcome news. The tips that I give here may be good for other language education programs but, with an IELTS program, you will be focusing more on the writing part and less on grammar.In an IELTS program, every student is tested and graded on his or her writing abilities. You can follow the same formula as you do with other types of tests. An IELTS test will need an essay that is complete with at least fifty to seventy-five lines of written work.If you have read this far, I hope that you are aware of the large number of choices you have before you. Since most of these courses are made up of twenty-five units each, you should have some idea about what that means. There are five different grades - short essays, papers, personal projects, conferences and fieldwork assignments. Each of these sections will be graded on a numeric scale based on the size of the document and the quantity of words you have used.When you are first in the process of writing an IELTS essay, you will have to commit to the idea that you want to give your audience an idea of what you know. Before you begin, however, make sure that you start out on the right foot by reading the rules thoroughly so that you know exactly what it is you need to write.Personal essays are often the first thing students want to do. After that, they decide on the projects and presentations they will prepare for. All of these will be listed in your final portfolio, and it is important that you know how to write these pieces from the very beginning. Keep in mind that the first and last paragraphs of a paper should be simple and to the point, and you should not try to stretch yourself too much or overdo it.Many people believe that using IELTS essay samples will help them improve their performance. However, if you use the wrong essay samples, you may get hurt by using them incorrectly. If you are having trouble with one or more aspects of the writing, it is important that you take the time to consult with an expert about how to find the right sample.By taking these tips for writing an IELTS essay, you can help prepare yourself for the toughest exam of your life. By reading and then following the tips presented here, you can prepare yourself well for the tests that await you. While many people are eager to get to the tests, you should remember that you cannot afford to let anything get in the way of a good test.

Vietnam war Free Essays

string(166) " impact on the viewers who realised a lot of Americans were killed, but they primarily saw the atrocities the American soldiers were imposing on Vietnamese soldiers\." When talking about American media during the time of the Vietnam Wars, a common belief is that US news coverage of the events had a significant impact on public opion about the conflict, at such an extent that is is sometimes refered to as the â€Å"Living- Room War† or the â€Å"Media War†. Critics of the US Media in coverage in Vietnam claim that most of the journalists were personnally against the war and their reports therefore negative portraits of US Involement in Vietnam, biased by their personal point of views. Other people thank the media for having given more accurate reports f what was happening in Vietnam than the ones given officially by the leaders of the country The accuracy and the objectivism of the media at that time is still questionned nowadays, but was is clear is that before the Tet offensive of 1968, the media had genrerally reported on the war quite favorably whereas It was presented in a more negative light at the end of the sixties and in the early seventies. We will write a custom essay sample on Vietnam war or any similar topic only for you Order Now The debate on the role played by the U. S. Media in the Vietnam wars is open: did the media follow public opinion, or did it Influence It? To what extent If any was the US media opposed to the Vietnam War? My essay shall first explore the shift brought by the Tet offensive In the US media. Then, shall focus on analyzing what caused the media to be accused of being against the Vietnam War before looking at the consequenses supposedly engedered by the role of the media. Finally I shall draw a limit on the role played by the media during the conflict. At the beginning of the war, American people seem to have supported it but public support decreased over the years. Although it was a major topic of the news by the end of the sixties. he Vietnam War was not a major concern for the American citizens t the beginning of the decade. Despite Kennedy’s decision to militarize the war and send military advisors to Vietnam, when Johnson replaced him, only one American on four was aware of the conflictsl . The Kennedy administration and the Johnson administration tried to keep the public away from the concern of the war. When J ohnson ran his election campaign, he was promising the Americans that he did not intend to escalate the war. He therefore stood for the peaceful candidate, and a lot of people would vote for him hoping he would find a diplomatic solution to the conflict.. An incident occurred during the time of the election campaign: the Gulf of Tonkin crisis. As Walt Rostow -a political theorist- noticed, the crisis occurred when needed. In fact, the resolution passed by the Congress gave Johnson a Justification to escalate the war and public opinion therefore accepted the decision. 2 The â€Å"carte blanche† given to President Johnson after the incident permitted him to escalate the war without any major opposition. A few people opposed it, like George Ball who was in favour of negociations rather than a military escalation that would be diffcult to ontrol. According to Daniel C Hallln, It Is only with the Gulf of Tonkin Incident that the Americans began to be conscious about the conflict occuring in Vietnam3. Political leaders supported, or at least, did not really opposed Johnson decision of ecalating the war, a decision he had taken without informing the American citizens. In 1965, â€Å"tuesday-lunch meetings†, Johnson had previously taken a lot of decisions through a limited group, whose members themselves started to doubt about the strategy in Vietnam. It is the case for McNamara who was pushed away from the decision- aking after having spokn in favour of a diplomatic solution. The disagreements within the governement started to serve as topic of critic for the Journalists who did not approve of the war. Senator William Fullbright instored the Senate Foreign Relation committee hearings that were televised. The conflict in Vietnam was not anymore presented through facts to the American public, but it was debated and criticized in front of them. In 1966, public opinion started to be reluctant about Johnson’s policy-making. At that stage, opinions over the war were divided, whereas it was between political leaders or etween the American citizens. A majority of people was against the war, but a minority agreed on what should be done to end the conflict. The key event that permitted the US media to play a role in the war occurred a few years later when the Tet Offensive took place. American people were already putting the war in question because of the fact that the war had already been carried on for a long time and had costed many lives of young Americans. But at the meantime, official statements were repeating that US army was making huge progression towards victory. The Tet Offensive is nowadays seen as the one that turned public opinion, and the war itself. When the Communists attacked South Vietmam in January 1968, the Americans and South Vietnamese turned back the attack. It was a clear military victory on the battlefields but the images resulting from the attack had an opposite efect on the audience. This event is genarally said to be decisive for the end of the conflicts. In fact, despite a military victory; another battle was yet oppen: the media war. The Tet Offensive was reported on American TV and provided the ublic for the first time with the violence of the war. They had been told victory was near: it was not what the shoking images of the Tet Offensive were displaying. The Viet Cong suffered great losses but they had managed to trigger a revolt within the American society. The credibility of the Johnson administration in the mind of the public was yet destroyed. The Tet Offensive on television displayed scenes of combat, of They had a shoking impact on the viewers who realised a lot of Americans were killed, but they primarily saw the atrocities the American soldiers were imposing on Vietnamese soldiers. You read "Vietnam war" in category "Papers" The Tet offensive was interpreted as a defeat by the media since it proved that victory was far for being near. One of the Journalists reporting on the Tet incident was CBS newscaster Walter Cronkite, â€Å"the most trusted man in America† according to a opinion poll, made the famous statement that the war would result either in a stalemate or a defeat4. Johnson was aware of the power the journalists had on the American society. After Cronkite had spoken about the war, Johnson said â€Å"Well, if I’ve lost Cronkite, I’ve lost middle America†. They had been antiwar protests that had been televised before 1968. The March on the Pentagon in 1967 was as a huge media event: Americans ah hippies putting home. However, antiwar movements were themselves divided. Some of them were radical movements that paradoxically proned violence to revolt against the atrocities in Vietnam. The radicalism of some of the movements made that media did not really know how to deal with them in the news and left some American reluctant to join them. But after the Tet Offensive, antiwar protests were presented on the screen in a more positive perspective. The movement itself gained strength after people istrust the governement and the media increased their coverage of protests. The media helped the antiwar movement to gain strength. The critical approach of the war the media took after the Tet Offensive helped the citizens to take more seriously what independent Journalists opposing the war had said before. At the end of the sixties, the image of the Vietnam War conveyed by the media was quite negative and until the withdrawal of the troops, the media not look at the Vietnam War in a postitive light. The Nixon government had to face another media scandal undermining US involvement in Vietnam in 1971. The New York Times stole a copy of the Pentagon Papers, a secret study â€Å"History of the US decision-making Process on Vietnam Policy’ and published it, followed by the Washington Post. As it was enlighted later in the New York Times in 1996, the publication of the Pentagone Papers prove the American people that Jonshon and his administration had constantly lied to the people but also to the Congress5. To defend the role played by the media during the conflict, Journalists argue that they were only providing the audience and the readers with what was hidden to them by official reports. The shift in the way US media presented the war after the Tet incident is the reason why media are sometimes said to have been opposed to the Vietnam War, and sometimes even accused of having been responsible for the defeat. Different opinions can be found on this matter, agreeing or rejecting those theories, but what seems clear is that a war was being carried on between the leaders of the country and the media. Nixon explicitly express his disagrement with US news coverage, arguing that aside from the Communists, â€Å"our worst enemy seems to be the press†6. According to him, media put an emphasis on the military and moral side of the combat, forgetting to speak about the genuine objective of the war which was to fight Communism. This objective is what had maintain the Journalists to speak in a united voice at the beginning of the conflict: the only Journalists who disaproved with the conflict did not disagree with its aim, but with the strategies employed to achieve it. 7 Johnson’s vice-president Spiro Angnew also regularly denounced the unneffciency and inaccuracy of the media, even calling the reporters â€Å"nattering nabobs of negativism†. In 1970, President Nixon founded the Office of Telecommunications Policy (OTP) to promote positive media coverage for his administration and to question indirectly the media’s accuracy. Critics of the press covering the Vietnam War are often stating that what the press did was showing daily fghts, forgetting about their aims, and focusing on details instead of providing the public with valuable informations. 8 Wyatt commented on this particular issue :†An intense focus on spot reporting of day-to-day combat and political stories (†¦ typified American Journalism in Vietnam. During the height of American military involvement, even the most interested, diligent [dedicated] news consumer could conclude that the war in Vietnam was primarily an American effort in which non-military issues were either nonexistent or unimportant. â€Å"9 A parallel can be drawn between human memory and news media coverage. 10 Both of them keep certain images and versions of events and supr ess others. The Journalists therefore chose to provide the American people with a certain approach to the conflic. What they are often blamed for in the coverage of the war, is that they have not been able o imform the Americans about the actions of the Viet Cong. By focusing on the violence of the conflicts involving Americans, the importance of the war crimes commited by the Viet Cong on the Vietnamese population was neglected. For those who believe that the Vietnam was lost because of the media, their argument is that by leading the nation to stand against the war, the soldiers on the battlefields lost the support they needed. In November 1969, President Nixon made a speech on television where he suggested that the â€Å"great silent majority’ of Americans supported the war and that the media were undermining the war effort. John Pilgrer is one of the Journalists denying the fact that the Vietnam War was lost because of the media. According to him, the media coverage did not undermined the military and political effort, and the reporters were not antiwar. ll He points out that what the media did was to support â€Å"a failed crusade†. It is for these reasons that some argue that Vietnam was not a military defeat, but more a social defeat generated by the media. Marshal McLuhan is a famous defensor of this theory. He argues: â€Å"Television brought the brutality of war into the comfort of the living room. Vietnam was lost in the living rooms of America, not on the battlefields of Vietnam. â€Å". The defeat can be explained by the fact that no military or political leaders had understood that the information war was at least as important as the military war. The media challenged the discrepencies between the reality in Vietnam and the reports of official sources. Emanating from a pluralistic media, the power of convincing the people was increased. Defensors of the media would argue primarily that it is only an excuse for the leaders not to take credit for a battle that ended up being a disaster for America. Richard Hallbrooke statement illustrates this point of view: â€Å"The press didn’t lose the war for us. The war was lost because the strategy was wrong. The military lost the war; the political leadership of this country lost the war. Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon and [Secretary of State] Henry Kissinger are the men who cost us this thing. Not the Case-Church Amendment [a law that placed restrictions on presidential war powers], not David Halberstam and Walter Cronkite, and not the antiwar demonstrators. The war was not lost, as Nixon always likes to write, in the halls of Congress and on the ages of the New York Times; it was lost in the rice paddies of Indochina. â€Å"12 They would also respond to the critic who claim that the war was lost because of the media showing only the horror of the fights, that only a small percentage of the news coverage were fghtings. However, an study by the sociologist George Bailey shows related to actions by US ground troops or US Air force. 13 According to many Journalists -Walter Conkrite being one of them-, media proved efficient in giving America truthful informations at a time when the government and the military leaders were lying to them. A credibility gap was therefore constructed, and vice-president Spiro Agnew accused the Journalists of being resonsible for it, stating that if such a gap existed, the best place to start looking for it was not the offices of governement in Washington but in the studios of network in New York. It is however hard to determine if the media were the source of influence for public opinion. The researches led by Daniel C. Hallin led to the conclusion that â€Å"Television was more a follower than a leader of public opinion. † The media had a different role in the Vietnam than it had had in previous conflicts. Instead of reinforcing the voice of the governement, it provived the public with a critical approach of US policy making. Also, because it was the first war being televised, it was the first time American people had to face images of the conflict. Those images are now what remains in the minds of the people when thinking about the news coverage of the Vietnam. At the time, the reporters were not really aware of the power it could have on the mind of the people, nor on the everlasting impact it had on the society. Television and photographs, the visual images of the war, is what people remember owadays. The fact that Journalist did not realise that they were actually opposing the war is a point that is worth raising. If the media proved to be opposed to the War, it may not be what they intented. The power the images displayed on television had on the public is hard to determine, as Hallin underlines: â€Å"television images pass very quickly, leaving the audience with little time to reflect on their meaning. We know very little about how television audiences construct the meaning of what they see and hear†. 14 The consequenses of showing the war on images was probably not anticipated by the eporters, but American public surely remembers pictures such as Vietnam Napalm† by Nick Ut (1972) or â€Å"The Execution† by Eddie Adams (1962). Life Magazine is the author of one of the most influential act during the war with the publication of an edition with photographs of the 242 American soldiers killed during one week of fighting. At the time of the Tet Offensive, Journalists rushed to cover the event. They gave America the pictures of the attack stating that what was happening there was horrific. The Tet Offensive was a real disaster in term of losses for the North Vietnamese soldiers. It appears clear that they knew they would not have any chance to win against the South Vietnamese and the Americans. This suicide-assault may illustrate that the Communists had understood the power the media could have in a fght. They wanted reporters to show to the people in America how violent were the conflicts, and how Americans slaughtered the Vietnamese. If such was their aim, they achieved it. Eddie Adams, the photograph who took the picture of a Viet Cong chief apologized to the US Army. 15 During the Vietnam. Wars, the media and the Americans seem to have followed the same opinion regarding the war. At the beginning, they were all genrerally supporting it. By the end of the sixties, they started to oppose it. The media might have influenced public opinion by starting to show the soldiers in action in Vietnam, by sympathise with antiwar movements or by displaying another version of event than the one given by the governement. Americans must have tend to believe what was told on the news at the time. They had believed the governement since the start of the war, and the war had still not ended. Moreover, the point of view given by the American media was one-sided: the enemy viewpoint was given in less than 3% of he coverage. 16 It is hard to define if the population influenced the media, or the contrary, and historians disagree on this point. Nevertheless, one must not forget that the Journalists were themselves American citizens, and therefore their voices counts as the voice of the nation. If we look at the news coverage on the Vietnam Wars, arguments can be found to describe the American media as being against the War. First of all, the fact that the media did not follow the same versions of events than the governement is one. How is the nation supposed to support a war launched y a governement that does not report the same versions of events as the ones shown on television and in the newspapers.? Morever, the antiwar movement was growing at the end of the sixties and antiwar protests were being covered by the media in a positive aspect. But what the media did that had the most impact on the American people is that they provided them with images of the conflict. Blood, violence, injuries: never a conflict had been covered that way on the television before. The shoking pictures stunned many people and the need for negociations to stop the disaster became the solution wanted by the people. In my opinion, Journalists were as shoked by the images as the people. They must have been revolted by the situation but did not intent to turn public opnion against the war. What I think they really did was to give the pictures that spoke for themselves to the public at first, and really speak against the war when they could embrace public opinion that was changing. To conclude with, I can say that the media were opposed to the war but in a limited way: the opinion on the coverage shifted with the public opinion and with the realization that the end of the war was far for being near. How to cite Vietnam war, Papers

You Belong To Me Essay Research Paper free essay sample

You Belong To Me Essay, Research Paper Mary Higgins Clark does a great occupation of maintaining the reader in suspense. Mary Higgins Clark introduces many characters that all could me surmise in the offenses she describes in this novel. You Belong to Me was decidedly one of her best plant. Dr. Susan Chandler, a clinical psychologist, is researching instances of losing adult females. On her day-to-day talk show, she focuses on the instance of Regina Clausen who disapeared on a sail three old ages earlier. In Regina # 8217 ; s properties, a turquoise ring with the lettering You Belong to Me engraved on the interior of the set is found. Carolyn Wells, a spectator, calls the show and says she recieved and indistinguishable turquoise ring from a adult male while on a recent sail. He tried to carry Carolyn to go forth the sail and rejoin it in another metropolis. Carolyn agrees to run into with Dr. We will write a custom essay sample on You Belong To Me Essay Research Paper or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Chandler to discourse the turquoise ring. On her manner to run into with Dr. Chandler, Carolyn was pushed in forepart of a new wave. She is earnestly injured and in a coma. Carolyn # 8217 ; s hubby, Justin, is suspected of seeking to slay her. Dr. Chandler thinks he may besides hold something to make with Regina # 8217 ; s disappearing. Soon other people that are related to the instance are cryptically murdered. Hilda Johnson who witnessed Carolyn # 8217 ; s accident claims it was knowing. Hilda Si murdered after she tells the constabulary her side of the narrative. The following twenty-four hours on Dr. Chandler # 8217 ; s demo a spectator named Tiffany calls and says her fellow bought her an indistinguishable turquoise ring. She can non retrieve the exact location, but it was a store in Greenwich Village. Tiffany besides mentions that the twenty-four hours she was at that place a crisp appareled adult male came in and bought several turquoise rings. Soon both Tiffany and the store proprietor are viciously stabbed to decease. P > In the interim, Dr. Chandler is dating two people. One is a psychologist and invitee on her show, Dr. Don Richards. The other is a affluent adult male named Alex Wright. Certain facts are introduced about both of these work forces that lead the reader to beleive that one of them may be the liquidator. As Dr. Chandler gets closer to work outing the instance, she does non recognize the danger she is in. While working tardily one dark, she is hit over the caput by a adult male, Alex Wright. This is the flood tide of the novel because the reader eventually discovers who the slayer is. Alex so admits to the old slayings. He besides reveals the maltreatment he received from his stepmother while turning up. Killing the adult females is a release of fury for him. Alex now wraps Dr. Chandler up in a plastic bag to kill her. She saved herself by cutting the bag on a piece of broken glass. Dr. Chandler solved the instance and saved her life ; she besides put a liquidator in gaol. You Belong to Me points out the dangers vulnerable alone adult females face. Mary Higgins # 8217 ; Clark # 8217 ; s characters are decidedly credible with the aid of a present twenty-four hours puting in New York. You Belong to Me is a really cliff-hanging book in which the intent is to chiefly entertain. Mary Higgins Clark creates two apparent struggles in this novel, individual vs. individual and individual vs. ego. The struggle individual vs. individual is evident when Alex is slaying he victims and when Dr. Chandler is working against him to work out the instance. Person vs. ego is a major struggle because his chief marks are adult females who are lonely and have no self-esteem. This struggle is besides shown when Alex reveals the emotional maltreatment his stepmother inflicted on him. You Belong to Me is a well-written book intended for immature grownups and grownups, it is a must read novel.

Free Essays on The Best And Worst Of Human Nature

'The best and worst of human nature, as would be expounded by Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, are demonstrated in these new lands and cultures.' It is true that the best and worst of human nature are demonstrated in these new lands and cultures. In the views of Locke and Hobbes are two very different points of view. In Thomas Hobbes point of view, human beings are organisms in motion and need to be restrained by authority from pursuing selfish ends. In the case of the Natives, he would have said that Spain had the right to conquer the Bahamas because the people had no leader that seemed to be apparent. Hobbes would have said that the people who lived in the Bahamas were not able to think for themselves and needed an authority, a King, to rule over the people. Thomas Hobbes said that if a man had acquired delight, moderate power or an already good life, the man would want more and delve into his own selfish needs. Hobbes said that without men being afraid that someone would stop them being selfish, any society would fall apart. There would be no one to stop men from acquiring too much or being too selfish. John Locke would have said that individuals form a community for their mutual benefit. Locke also said that, ‘all men were, by nature, free, equal and independent’ and no one can subject to ‘the Political Power of another, without his own Consent.’ John Locke would have said that the Natives of the Bahamas were not respected. He might also have said that their rights were being compromised and that the Spanish should not have conquered them. The Natives as a people never asked to be conquered. The Natives were a community. John Locke had said that, ‘the act of the Majority passes for the act of the whole, and of course determines as having by the law of Nature and Reason the power of a whole.’ This would mean that the Natives were already their own government and that they would not delve into selfish needs because their... Free Essays on The Best And Worst Of Human Nature Free Essays on The Best And Worst Of Human Nature 'The best and worst of human nature, as would be expounded by Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, are demonstrated in these new lands and cultures.' It is true that the best and worst of human nature are demonstrated in these new lands and cultures. In the views of Locke and Hobbes are two very different points of view. In Thomas Hobbes point of view, human beings are organisms in motion and need to be restrained by authority from pursuing selfish ends. In the case of the Natives, he would have said that Spain had the right to conquer the Bahamas because the people had no leader that seemed to be apparent. Hobbes would have said that the people who lived in the Bahamas were not able to think for themselves and needed an authority, a King, to rule over the people. Thomas Hobbes said that if a man had acquired delight, moderate power or an already good life, the man would want more and delve into his own selfish needs. Hobbes said that without men being afraid that someone would stop them being selfish, any society would fall apart. There would be no one to stop men from acquiring too much or being too selfish. John Locke would have said that individuals form a community for their mutual benefit. Locke also said that, ‘all men were, by nature, free, equal and independent’ and no one can subject to ‘the Political Power of another, without his own Consent.’ John Locke would have said that the Natives of the Bahamas were not respected. He might also have said that their rights were being compromised and that the Spanish should not have conquered them. The Natives as a people never asked to be conquered. The Natives were a community. John Locke had said that, ‘the act of the Majority passes for the act of the whole, and of course determines as having by the law of Nature and Reason the power of a whole.’ This would mean that the Natives were already their own government and that they would not delve into selfish needs because their...

I Have This Story to Tell . . .

I Have This Story to Tell . . . Wherever I appear, invariably someone comes up to me and asks how they can get published. I open the dialogue with questions such as: 1) Have you finished writing the story? 2) Have you edited the story with a vengeance a zillion times? 3) Have you gotten feedback from non-friends and non-family who understand the genre? 4) Have you studied indie versus traditional and understand the details of both? Maybe I ask a few more questions depending upon the nature and interests of the person. We might delve into platform and online presence. But the eyes of half those writers interrupt or divert back into a long explanation about the story; why they are writing it; what its about; why it needs to be told. I gently pull them back to the original question about publishing, and learning the craft well enough to be worthy of publishing. Some come back with me. Then there are those who, like a rubber band, launch back into a dissertation about the story. Inevitably we part, with nothing accomplished other than the writer is happy they were able to talk about their story. We didnt really discuss much about writing well or publishing smart. While the person said they wanted to know those answers, they were too wrapped up in the story. They didnt want to hear the hard part of the journey. Theyre too busy enjoying the dream. I understand that to a point. They are living the story in their head. Its a great one to know, to tell. But all they want to know about the business after the writing is PUBLISH. They want a short cut from GOOD STORY IDEA to PUBLISH, without the details. The vast chasm that is writing, editing, developing a voice, and learning the business is considered a minor obstacle in the quest to get from point A to point B, not understanding theres a long journey of canyons, mountains, and hell/fire/brimstone in between. Keep in mind that writing is more about the craft than about the subject matter. A beautiful writer can write about anything. A mediocre writer with a good idea rarely makes it off the ground. The best advice I can give you is to learn how to write (take classes, join writers groups, hire an editor) then publish. Everyone has a journey, but not everyone takes the time to learn how to write it well. Fewer still learn how to put it into print so that the GOOD STORY IDEA can reach readers. Fall in love with your story, but fall in love with the other parts, too.