Free Essays on The Best And Worst Of Human Nature

'The best and worst of human nature, as would be expounded by Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, are demonstrated in these new lands and cultures.' It is true that the best and worst of human nature are demonstrated in these new lands and cultures. In the views of Locke and Hobbes are two very different points of view. In Thomas Hobbes point of view, human beings are organisms in motion and need to be restrained by authority from pursuing selfish ends. In the case of the Natives, he would have said that Spain had the right to conquer the Bahamas because the people had no leader that seemed to be apparent. Hobbes would have said that the people who lived in the Bahamas were not able to think for themselves and needed an authority, a King, to rule over the people. Thomas Hobbes said that if a man had acquired delight, moderate power or an already good life, the man would want more and delve into his own selfish needs. Hobbes said that without men being afraid that someone would stop them being selfish, any society would fall apart. There would be no one to stop men from acquiring too much or being too selfish. John Locke would have said that individuals form a community for their mutual benefit. Locke also said that, ‘all men were, by nature, free, equal and independent’ and no one can subject to ‘the Political Power of another, without his own Consent.’ John Locke would have said that the Natives of the Bahamas were not respected. He might also have said that their rights were being compromised and that the Spanish should not have conquered them. The Natives as a people never asked to be conquered. The Natives were a community. John Locke had said that, ‘the act of the Majority passes for the act of the whole, and of course determines as having by the law of Nature and Reason the power of a whole.’ This would mean that the Natives were already their own government and that they would not delve into selfish needs because their... Free Essays on The Best And Worst Of Human Nature Free Essays on The Best And Worst Of Human Nature 'The best and worst of human nature, as would be expounded by Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, are demonstrated in these new lands and cultures.' It is true that the best and worst of human nature are demonstrated in these new lands and cultures. In the views of Locke and Hobbes are two very different points of view. In Thomas Hobbes point of view, human beings are organisms in motion and need to be restrained by authority from pursuing selfish ends. In the case of the Natives, he would have said that Spain had the right to conquer the Bahamas because the people had no leader that seemed to be apparent. Hobbes would have said that the people who lived in the Bahamas were not able to think for themselves and needed an authority, a King, to rule over the people. Thomas Hobbes said that if a man had acquired delight, moderate power or an already good life, the man would want more and delve into his own selfish needs. Hobbes said that without men being afraid that someone would stop them being selfish, any society would fall apart. There would be no one to stop men from acquiring too much or being too selfish. John Locke would have said that individuals form a community for their mutual benefit. Locke also said that, ‘all men were, by nature, free, equal and independent’ and no one can subject to ‘the Political Power of another, without his own Consent.’ John Locke would have said that the Natives of the Bahamas were not respected. He might also have said that their rights were being compromised and that the Spanish should not have conquered them. The Natives as a people never asked to be conquered. The Natives were a community. John Locke had said that, ‘the act of the Majority passes for the act of the whole, and of course determines as having by the law of Nature and Reason the power of a whole.’ This would mean that the Natives were already their own government and that they would not delve into selfish needs because their...

I Have This Story to Tell . . .

I Have This Story to Tell . . . Wherever I appear, invariably someone comes up to me and asks how they can get published. I open the dialogue with questions such as: 1) Have you finished writing the story? 2) Have you edited the story with a vengeance a zillion times? 3) Have you gotten feedback from non-friends and non-family who understand the genre? 4) Have you studied indie versus traditional and understand the details of both? Maybe I ask a few more questions depending upon the nature and interests of the person. We might delve into platform and online presence. But the eyes of half those writers interrupt or divert back into a long explanation about the story; why they are writing it; what its about; why it needs to be told. I gently pull them back to the original question about publishing, and learning the craft well enough to be worthy of publishing. Some come back with me. Then there are those who, like a rubber band, launch back into a dissertation about the story. Inevitably we part, with nothing accomplished other than the writer is happy they were able to talk about their story. We didnt really discuss much about writing well or publishing smart. While the person said they wanted to know those answers, they were too wrapped up in the story. They didnt want to hear the hard part of the journey. Theyre too busy enjoying the dream. I understand that to a point. They are living the story in their head. Its a great one to know, to tell. But all they want to know about the business after the writing is PUBLISH. They want a short cut from GOOD STORY IDEA to PUBLISH, without the details. The vast chasm that is writing, editing, developing a voice, and learning the business is considered a minor obstacle in the quest to get from point A to point B, not understanding theres a long journey of canyons, mountains, and hell/fire/brimstone in between. Keep in mind that writing is more about the craft than about the subject matter. A beautiful writer can write about anything. A mediocre writer with a good idea rarely makes it off the ground. The best advice I can give you is to learn how to write (take classes, join writers groups, hire an editor) then publish. Everyone has a journey, but not everyone takes the time to learn how to write it well. Fewer still learn how to put it into print so that the GOOD STORY IDEA can reach readers. Fall in love with your story, but fall in love with the other parts, too.